top of page
In one hand, the sensibilities comes from the MODFLOW results along the way of PEST [parameters] variation’s. While [observations] “susceptibilities” (just to differentiate it from the previous ones) comes linked to the volumetric fluxes (and stated amplitudes) of boundary conditions, from a given numeric realization.
Each and all - actually non existent - [observation flux for small segments of boundary conditions] and associated amplitudes must be watched out and kept at bay for possible’s variations (by the Management Platform), for we don’t want all the water being seeped by a fell cells of the model.
There is no upper bound for the number of variable to be considered. It must be in accordance with model demands in reaching a good solution. Actually the more variables the better, as more space, literally, are given to the algorithm to make the choices, and adapt the numerical solution to an already known - and or some unsuspected - idiosyncrasies documented on site.
The control vectors of last realization are interposed on the next 03 pages.
Targets: Hydraulic Heads (m) and boundary conditions fluxes (m3/d) ... to be pursued
Modelled; Measured; Max. | Min. Amplitudes; new Targets; and previous sensibilities for each parameter variation.
Idem for the remanning parameters related to pilot points of hydraulic conductivities. And spatial positioning’s.
Versão completa desta página apenas em formato Desktop.
Content fully developed only in desktop format.
bottom of page